----------- ALA 2009 REVIEW FORM ---------------------

1. SUMMARY

What is/are the main contribution(s) of the paper?


2. TYPE OF THE PAPER

The paper reports on:
  [ ] Preliminary research
  [ ] Mature research, but work still in progress
  [ ] Completed research


3. GENERAL RATINGS

Please rate the following criteria by, each time, using only
one of the five following words: BAD, WEAK, FAIR, GOOD, EXCELLENT.

a. Relevance to ALAMAS: 
b. Originality:  
c. Significance, Usefulness: 
d. Technical soundness: 
e. Organization: 
f. References: 
g. Presentation/readability: 
h. English:


4. DETAILED COMMENTS


5. GENERAL RECOMMENDATION

  [ ] recommended for acceptance as full paper (8 pages)
  [ ] recommended for acceptance as short paper (4 pages)
  [ ] not recommended for acceptance


6. REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE IN THE SUBJECT AREA OF THE PAPER

  [ ] High
  [ ] Medium-high
  [ ] Medium
  [ ] Medium-low
  [ ] Low